Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:19

What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Can the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) be reversed?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
MLB investigating abuse claims from Giants pitcher’s wife - KRON4
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Trump Questioned Extent Of Musk’s DOGE Cuts, Report Says - Forbes
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Pediatric flu deaths surge in Michigan: 'These are children' - The Detroit News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why do men find women with bigger buttocks attractive?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What Happened at Pitchfork’s Zine Launch With Turnstile - Pitchfork
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.